Systematic reviews take a long time, but are the gold standard in evaluating evidence and producing medical recommendations.

There is no clear evidence that cannabis-based medicines provide pain relief for chronic neuropathic pain, an updated review ...

Across several analyses, no links between exposure to acetaminophen (also known as paracetamol) during pregnancy and ...

Systematic reviews and clinical trials form the cornerstone of contemporary health research, providing robust, evidence‐based insights that guide clinical practice and policy. Systematic reviews ...

Objective This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of exercise interventions in alleviating depression and ...

Systematic reviews are fundamental to the appraisal and synthesis of evidence in health and social care. They utilise pre‐defined protocols to gather, evaluate and integrate findings from diverse ...

Oncoscope launches the first Real-time, AI-supported Living Systematic Literature Review designed for enterprise-wide ...

A systematic review of 45 studies found that physicians perceive one in six patient visits in non-psychiatric clinics as ...

A systematic review found high return to sport after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, with similar outcomes across implant ...

Despite rapid advances in large language models, this study shows that human expertise remains critical for producing rigorous systematic reviews, with AI best suited as a supervised support tool ...

An ad hoc committee of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine will produce a report to update the standards for systematic reviews as defined in the 2011 report Finding What ...

Objective To synthesise data on the associations between cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and health in children and adolescents, evaluate the certainty of evidence and identify knowledge gaps. Design ...